Asciinema vs Plyr
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Asciinema · Plyr · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
2
33
Open Page Rank 8+
11
369
Open Page Rank 7+
17
1,276
Open Page Rank 6+
25
2,352
Open Page Rank 5+
39
3,982
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Asciinema · Plyr · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
73
24,525
India
66
11,724
Germany
37
11,508
Japan
43
11,291
United Kingdom
37
10,836
France
44
9,250
Italy
31
8,056
Canada
34
7,870
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Asciinema | Plyr |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.4 s | 2 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 800 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.