Asciinema vs Plyr
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Asciinema · Plyr · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
1
33
Open Page Rank 8+
8
371
Open Page Rank 7+
15
1,265
Open Page Rank 6+
23
2,349
Open Page Rank 5+
36
3,960
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Asciinema · Plyr · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
67
21,879
India
57
10,363
Germany
35
10,092
Japan
34
9,899
United Kingdom
35
9,516
France
32
7,673
Italy
28
6,978
Canada
31
6,832
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Asciinema | Plyr |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.2 s | 2 s |
| INP | 37 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 800 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.