Font Awesome vs Fork Awesome
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Font Awesome · Fork Awesome · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Font Awesome · Fork Awesome · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
632,291
219
India
324,306
140
United Kingdom
207,574
100
Brazil
207,581
86
Germany
205,247
132
Japan
201,986
151
France
182,046
159
Italy
170,820
89
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Font Awesome | Fork Awesome |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2 s | 1.5 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 900 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Fork Awesome to Font Awesome
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| hombresdesnudos.online | Nov 2025 |