Font Awesome vs Fork Awesome
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Font Awesome · Fork Awesome · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Font Awesome · Fork Awesome · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
718,507
248
India
371,684
155
United Kingdom
240,928
111
Japan
235,585
179
Germany
233,966
157
Brazil
231,166
89
France
220,119
192
Italy
200,492
102
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Font Awesome | Fork Awesome |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2 s | 1.5 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 900 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Fork Awesome to Font Awesome
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| hombresdesnudos.online | Nov 2025 |