Funding Choices vs Metomic
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Funding Choices · Metomic · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
22
0
Open Page Rank 8+
448
0
Open Page Rank 7+
2,170
0
Open Page Rank 6+
4,377
0
Open Page Rank 5+
7,713
0
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Funding Choices · Metomic · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
59,886
0
India
44,115
0
Japan
40,056
0
United Kingdom
31,098
0
Germany
30,553
2
France
28,998
0
Brazil
26,385
0
Canada
26,288
0
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Funding Choices | Metomic |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 125 ms |
| CLS | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| TTFB | 900 ms | 400 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.