iubenda vs Metomic
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
iubenda · Metomic · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
13
0
Open Page Rank 8+
106
0
Open Page Rank 7+
401
0
Open Page Rank 6+
861
0
Open Page Rank 5+
1,665
0
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
iubenda · Metomic · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Italy
88,892
0
Germany
8,414
2
United States
7,944
0
France
6,537
0
United Kingdom
6,217
0
Spain
5,013
0
Belgium
3,434
0
India
3,344
0
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | iubenda | Metomic |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 125 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0.05 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 400 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.