200 vs Font Awesome
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Detections for 200 end in Jan 2021. The fingerprint catalog behind our crawls no longer carries that technology as its own entry, usually because it was retired or split into more specific ones, so its figure is the last recorded and is not directly comparable with a currently tracked technology.
Top sites by authority
200 · Font Awesome · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
200 · Font Awesome · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
0
632,291
India
0
324,306
Brazil
0
207,581
United Kingdom
0
207,574
Germany
0
205,247
Japan
0
201,986
France
0
182,046
Italy
0
170,820
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | 200 | Font Awesome |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.6 s | 2 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1400 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.