200 vs Typekit
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Detections for 200 end in Jan 2021. The fingerprint catalog behind our crawls no longer carries that technology as its own entry, usually because it was retired or split into more specific ones, so its figure is the last recorded and is not directly comparable with a currently tracked technology.
Top sites by authority
200 · Typekit · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
200 · Typekit · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
0
234,811
United Kingdom
0
66,880
Canada
0
44,247
Australia
0
32,492
India
0
30,788
Germany
0
28,801
France
0
27,896
Netherlands
0
23,850
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | 200 | Typekit |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.8 s | 1.7 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1600 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.