AccessiBe vs Enable
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
AccessiBe · Enable · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
15
2
Open Page Rank 8+
144
9
Open Page Rank 7+
561
11
Open Page Rank 6+
1,251
21
Open Page Rank 5+
2,495
31
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
AccessiBe · Enable · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
45,096
242
Israel
1,415
6,908
Canada
6,922
55
India
5,019
76
Italy
4,827
63
United Kingdom
4,657
96
Germany
2,728
55
France
2,349
58
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | AccessiBe | Enable |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.8 s | 2.2 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 1100 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
AccessiBe to Enable
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| basar2000.co.il | Nov 2025 |
| alter.co.il | Oct 2025 |
Enable to AccessiBe
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| danon-jewellery.co.il | May 2026 |
| alter.co.il | Oct 2025 |