AccessiBe vs Piman
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
AccessiBe · Piman · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
18
1
Open Page Rank 8+
149
2
Open Page Rank 7+
572
9
Open Page Rank 6+
1,274
12
Open Page Rank 5+
2,539
12
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
AccessiBe · Piman · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
52,300
9
Canada
8,012
4
India
5,915
10
United Kingdom
5,405
4
Italy
5,238
7
Germany
3,286
10
France
3,095
8
Australia
2,787
4
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | AccessiBe | Piman |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.9 s | 1.6 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0.05 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.