AccessiBe vs Piman
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
AccessiBe · Piman · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
17
1
Open Page Rank 8+
150
3
Open Page Rank 7+
570
9
Open Page Rank 6+
1,261
12
Open Page Rank 5+
2,502
12
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
AccessiBe · Piman · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
46,005
6
Canada
7,066
3
India
5,242
5
United Kingdom
4,760
4
Italy
4,540
5
Germany
2,801
6
Australia
2,438
4
France
2,407
5
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | AccessiBe | Piman |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 87 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0.05 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 850 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.