amoCRM vs Keap
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
amoCRM · Keap · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
2
0
Open Page Rank 8+
9
6
Open Page Rank 7+
14
12
Open Page Rank 6+
22
25
Open Page Rank 5+
32
43
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
amoCRM · Keap · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Russia
2,484
20
United States
204
1,149
Brazil
547
114
United Kingdom
119
325
Belarus
419
11
Mexico
291
104
Kazakhstan
351
11
Canada
52
297
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | amoCRM | Keap |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 900 ms | 1200 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.