amoCRM vs Keap
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
amoCRM · Keap · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
2
0
Open Page Rank 8+
10
6
Open Page Rank 7+
16
12
Open Page Rank 6+
22
23
Open Page Rank 5+
34
41
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
amoCRM · Keap · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Russia
2,860
23
United States
336
1,340
Brazil
607
123
United Kingdom
135
393
Belarus
487
10
Germany
380
109
Mexico
325
119
Kazakhstan
402
14
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | amoCRM | Keap |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 900 ms | 1200 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.