amoCRM vs Pico
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
amoCRM · Pico · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
2
0
Open Page Rank 8+
10
0
Open Page Rank 7+
16
0
Open Page Rank 6+
22
1
Open Page Rank 5+
34
1
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
amoCRM · Pico · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Russia
2,860
6
Brazil
607
5
Belarus
487
2
Germany
380
80
Kazakhstan
402
4
United States
336
36
Mexico
325
6
Ukraine
286
7
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | amoCRM | Pico |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 900 ms | 800 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.