AMP vs InfernoJS
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
AMP · InfernoJS · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
23
0
Open Page Rank 8+
190
1
Open Page Rank 7+
534
2
Open Page Rank 6+
884
2
Open Page Rank 5+
1,410
2
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
AMP · InfernoJS · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Indonesia
70,740
3
United States
13,389
9
India
9,882
6
Brazil
8,300
5
Türkiye
5,993
5
United Kingdom
5,796
7
Germany
5,405
6
France
5,120
5
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | AMP | InfernoJS |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
| INP | 150 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 1100 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.