AMP vs Phaser
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
AMP · Phaser · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
20
5
Open Page Rank 8+
187
18
Open Page Rank 7+
535
36
Open Page Rank 6+
915
46
Open Page Rank 5+
1,485
63
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
AMP · Phaser · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Indonesia
73,082
220
United States
15,093
379
India
10,920
289
Brazil
9,291
191
Singapore
7,484
161
Türkiye
7,002
161
United Kingdom
6,420
258
Germany
6,209
227
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | AMP | Phaser |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 2.4 s |
| INP | 150 ms | 125 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.