AMP vs Phaser
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
AMP · Phaser · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
24
6
Open Page Rank 8+
199
24
Open Page Rank 7+
553
40
Open Page Rank 6+
917
48
Open Page Rank 5+
1,458
66
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
AMP · Phaser · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Indonesia
70,740
190
United States
13,389
359
India
9,882
262
Brazil
8,300
178
Türkiye
5,993
148
United Kingdom
5,796
243
Germany
5,405
224
France
5,120
218
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | AMP | Phaser |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
| INP | 150 ms | 125 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.