Attentive vs True Fit
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Attentive · True Fit · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
5
0
Open Page Rank 8+
42
1
Open Page Rank 7+
200
2
Open Page Rank 6+
449
4
Open Page Rank 5+
904
18
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Attentive · True Fit · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
7,463
109
Canada
3,794
67
United Kingdom
3,076
71
India
2,879
65
Australia
2,183
64
Mexico
1,723
33
Germany
1,698
41
France
1,543
37
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Attentive | True Fit |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.7 s | 1.9 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 150 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 500 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Oct 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
True Fit to Attentive
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| perkclothing.com | May 2026 |