BrowserCMS vs Tilda
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
BrowserCMS · Tilda · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
2
Open Page Rank 8+
0
47
Open Page Rank 7+
0
168
Open Page Rank 6+
0
331
Open Page Rank 5+
0
559
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
BrowserCMS · Tilda · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Russia
1
69,408
Belarus
0
7,238
Kazakhstan
0
7,015
Ukraine
2
6,416
Germany
4
5,150
United States
5
4,354
Netherlands
2
3,273
Uzbekistan
0
2,931
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | BrowserCMS | Tilda |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.6 s | 2.3 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 600 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.