BugHerd vs Marker
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
BugHerd · Marker · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
10
10
Open Page Rank 8+
75
35
Open Page Rank 7+
214
106
Open Page Rank 6+
373
200
Open Page Rank 5+
601
320
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
BugHerd · Marker · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
4,349
1,819
United Kingdom
1,388
672
Canada
1,365
638
India
1,218
536
Australia
1,196
421
Germany
645
386
France
636
324
Mexico
547
263
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | BugHerd | Marker |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.8 s | 1.7 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Marker to BugHerd
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| arkansas.com | Feb 2026 |