BugHerd vs Marker
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
BugHerd · Marker · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
18
9
Open Page Rank 8+
115
34
Open Page Rank 7+
299
109
Open Page Rank 6+
522
205
Open Page Rank 5+
806
328
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
BugHerd · Marker · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
5,126
2,067
Canada
1,760
733
United Kingdom
1,718
771
India
1,611
607
Australia
1,487
480
Germany
879
467
France
934
390
Mexico
732
313
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | BugHerd | Marker |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.8 s | 1.8 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Marker to BugHerd
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| arkansas.com | Feb 2026 |