Chart.js vs KineticJS
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Chart.js · KineticJS · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
52
4
Open Page Rank 8+
903
30
Open Page Rank 7+
3,177
70
Open Page Rank 6+
5,538
102
Open Page Rank 5+
8,772
152
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Chart.js · KineticJS · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
54,017
744
India
28,724
665
Germany
24,266
579
Italy
22,638
385
United Kingdom
20,687
381
Spain
20,634
303
France
20,440
465
Brazil
19,935
293
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Chart.js | KineticJS |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 1.9 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 800 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Chart.js to KineticJS
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| tpwesternodisha.com | Apr 2026 |
| amendisclient.ma | Dec 2025 |
KineticJS to Chart.js
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| tpwesternodisha.com | Apr 2026 |
| amendisclient.ma | Dec 2025 |
| bpspapua.com | Sep 2025 |