Chart.js vs Rickshaw
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Chart.js · Rickshaw · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
51
0
Open Page Rank 8+
858
2
Open Page Rank 7+
2,989
5
Open Page Rank 6+
5,233
13
Open Page Rank 5+
8,295
17
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Chart.js · Rickshaw · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
47,410
85
India
24,979
86
Germany
21,175
48
Italy
20,268
48
Spain
18,944
45
United Kingdom
18,448
58
Brazil
17,645
43
France
17,424
49
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Chart.js | Rickshaw |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 1.9 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Chart.js to Rickshaw
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| envigado.gov.co | Mar 2026 |
Rickshaw to Chart.js
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| envigado.gov.co | Mar 2026 |