Chart.js vs Rickshaw
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Chart.js · Rickshaw · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
48
0
Open Page Rank 8+
883
4
Open Page Rank 7+
3,106
7
Open Page Rank 6+
5,438
14
Open Page Rank 5+
8,607
20
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Chart.js · Rickshaw · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
48,182
85
India
25,375
86
Germany
21,390
51
Italy
19,374
48
United Kingdom
18,271
62
Brazil
18,003
44
Spain
17,614
44
France
17,096
50
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Chart.js | Rickshaw |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 1.9 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Chart.js to Rickshaw
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| envigado.gov.co | Mar 2026 |
Rickshaw to Chart.js
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| envigado.gov.co | Mar 2026 |