Chart.js vs TradingView
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Chart.js · TradingView · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
51
4
Open Page Rank 8+
874
8
Open Page Rank 7+
3,052
11
Open Page Rank 6+
5,320
12
Open Page Rank 5+
8,413
15
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Chart.js · TradingView · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
47,410
157
India
24,979
186
Germany
21,175
73
Italy
20,268
55
Spain
18,944
52
United Kingdom
18,448
67
Brazil
17,645
59
France
17,424
65
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Chart.js | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 800 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Chart.js to TradingView
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| mggoldbullions.com | Apr 2026 |
| edge-forex.com | Jan 2026 |