Concrete CMS vs Joomla
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Concrete CMS · Joomla · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
8
13
Open Page Rank 8+
62
265
Open Page Rank 7+
136
919
Open Page Rank 6+
244
1,773
Open Page Rank 5+
426
3,211
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Concrete CMS · Joomla · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Germany
903
25,264
United States
2,205
19,343
Italy
380
15,211
Poland
562
14,311
Russia
119
12,782
France
542
10,685
United Kingdom
1,316
7,544
Spain
288
8,563
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Concrete CMS | Joomla |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.6 s | 1.9 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 900 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Concrete CMS to Joomla
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| mieszkaniabusko.pl | Jun 2026 |