Concrete CMS vs Joomla
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Concrete CMS · Joomla · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
8
13
Open Page Rank 8+
61
254
Open Page Rank 7+
132
887
Open Page Rank 6+
238
1,694
Open Page Rank 5+
422
3,071
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Concrete CMS · Joomla · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Germany
894
25,269
United States
2,163
18,958
Italy
384
15,642
Poland
542
14,115
Russia
127
12,845
France
523
10,796
Spain
294
9,081
United Kingdom
1,301
7,370
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Concrete CMS | Joomla |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.6 s | 1.8 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 900 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Concrete CMS to Joomla
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| mieszkaniabusko.pl | Jun 2026 |