Contentful vs Joomla
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Contentful · Joomla · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
31
14
Open Page Rank 8+
226
252
Open Page Rank 7+
662
880
Open Page Rank 6+
1,162
1,677
Open Page Rank 5+
1,796
3,046
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Contentful · Joomla · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Germany
3,087
25,269
United States
6,833
18,958
Italy
2,380
15,642
Poland
1,681
14,115
Russia
946
12,845
France
2,708
10,796
Spain
2,516
9,081
United Kingdom
3,859
7,370
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Contentful | Joomla |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Joomla to Contentful
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| mtu.edu.iq | Oct 2025 |