Contentful vs Joomla
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Contentful · Joomla · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
30
13
Open Page Rank 8+
235
265
Open Page Rank 7+
690
919
Open Page Rank 6+
1,191
1,773
Open Page Rank 5+
1,833
3,211
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Contentful · Joomla · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Germany
3,111
25,264
United States
6,809
19,343
Italy
2,325
15,211
Poland
1,732
14,311
Russia
934
12,782
France
2,689
10,685
United Kingdom
3,830
7,544
Spain
2,421
8,563
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Contentful | Joomla |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Joomla to Contentful
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| mtu.edu.iq | Oct 2025 |