Criteo vs LKQD
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Detections for LKQD end in Sep 2025. The fingerprint catalog behind our crawls no longer carries that technology as its own entry, usually because it was retired or split into more specific ones, so its figure is the last recorded and is not directly comparable with a currently tracked technology.
Top sites by authority
Criteo · LKQD · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Criteo · LKQD · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
41,070
89
United Kingdom
23,599
62
Canada
22,368
58
Germany
19,382
65
India
17,749
38
France
17,018
65
Spain
15,932
93
Italy
15,643
79
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Criteo | LKQD |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 125 ms | 150 ms |
| CLS | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.