DedeCMS vs Tilda
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
DedeCMS · Tilda · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
3
Open Page Rank 8+
0
44
Open Page Rank 7+
1
167
Open Page Rank 6+
1
323
Open Page Rank 5+
2
530
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
DedeCMS · Tilda · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Russia
4
61,927
Belarus
0
6,157
Kazakhstan
0
5,955
Ukraine
0
5,133
Germany
9
3,400
United States
32
2,764
Netherlands
2
2,641
Uzbekistan
0
2,297
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | DedeCMS | Tilda |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.5 s | 2.2 s |
| INP | 25 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 600 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.