Editor.js vs Froala Editor
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Editor.js · Froala Editor · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Editor.js · Froala Editor · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
42
26,346
South Korea
8
10,483
Japan
19
7,025
Poland
13
5,913
India
27
4,315
United Kingdom
24
4,205
Canada
14
3,767
Germany
34
3,267
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Editor.js | Froala Editor |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.4 s | 1.7 s |
| INP | 150 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 300 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Froala Editor to Editor.js
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| u-tokyo.ac.jp | Sep 2025 |