Facebook vs POWR
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Facebook · POWR · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
8
Open Page Rank 8+
0
50
Open Page Rank 7+
0
130
Open Page Rank 6+
0
219
Open Page Rank 5+
0
340
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Facebook · POWR · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
90,322
14,435
United Kingdom
43,945
3,466
India
41,142
2,664
Canada
39,072
3,775
Germany
38,133
1,979
France
33,742
1,827
Brazil
33,915
888
Spain
31,059
1,302
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | POWR | |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.9 s | 1.5 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 500 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Facebook to POWR
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| kellotarvike.fi | Jan 2026 |