Fork Awesome vs Typekit
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Fork Awesome · Typekit · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
5
75
Open Page Rank 8+
23
1,199
Open Page Rank 7+
47
4,611
Open Page Rank 6+
59
9,089
Open Page Rank 5+
78
16,615
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Fork Awesome · Typekit · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
248
266,916
United Kingdom
111
76,151
Canada
104
50,710
Australia
67
37,741
India
155
35,932
France
192
33,098
Germany
157
32,958
Netherlands
101
26,764
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Fork Awesome | Typekit |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.5 s | 1.7 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 600 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.