Fork Awesome vs Typekit
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Fork Awesome · Typekit · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
4
72
Open Page Rank 8+
20
1,160
Open Page Rank 7+
41
4,508
Open Page Rank 6+
51
8,956
Open Page Rank 5+
70
16,379
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Fork Awesome · Typekit · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
212
234,811
United Kingdom
99
66,880
Canada
90
44,247
Australia
58
32,492
India
139
30,788
Germany
126
28,801
France
161
27,896
Netherlands
86
23,850
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Fork Awesome | Typekit |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.6 s | 1.7 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.