Fork Awesome vs Typekit
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Fork Awesome · Typekit · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
4
74
Open Page Rank 8+
21
1,189
Open Page Rank 7+
44
4,562
Open Page Rank 6+
55
9,037
Open Page Rank 5+
74
16,515
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Fork Awesome · Typekit · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
219
239,910
United Kingdom
100
66,281
Canada
95
44,372
Australia
61
33,503
India
140
31,481
Germany
132
29,619
France
159
27,484
Netherlands
80
23,229
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Fork Awesome | Typekit |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.5 s | 1.7 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.