GlassFish vs LiteSpeed
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
GlassFish · LiteSpeed · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
1
16
Open Page Rank 8+
14
238
Open Page Rank 7+
45
892
Open Page Rank 6+
67
2,084
Open Page Rank 5+
98
4,867
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
GlassFish · LiteSpeed · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
183
142,798
United States
350
96,715
Indonesia
139
90,611
Poland
93
83,488
Brazil
376
81,829
United Kingdom
161
60,596
Türkiye
111
60,567
Vietnam
59
49,050
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | GlassFish | LiteSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.7 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 600 ms | 1000 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
GlassFish to LiteSpeed
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| portalgb.com.br | Oct 2025 |