GlassFish vs LiteSpeed
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
GlassFish · LiteSpeed · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
1
18
Open Page Rank 8+
14
238
Open Page Rank 7+
41
864
Open Page Rank 6+
63
1,984
Open Page Rank 5+
95
4,601
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
GlassFish · LiteSpeed · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
165
108,379
United States
316
81,175
Poland
82
72,768
Indonesia
114
71,564
Brazil
339
68,054
United Kingdom
142
50,531
Türkiye
94
49,519
Vietnam
56
39,882
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | GlassFish | LiteSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.7 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 600 ms | 1000 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
GlassFish to LiteSpeed
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| portalgb.com.br | Oct 2025 |