GlassFish vs LiteSpeed
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
GlassFish · LiteSpeed · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
1
15
Open Page Rank 8+
15
233
Open Page Rank 7+
44
871
Open Page Rank 6+
65
2,027
Open Page Rank 5+
96
4,745
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
GlassFish · LiteSpeed · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
164
123,292
United States
305
84,795
Brazil
342
75,601
Poland
86
75,651
Indonesia
111
74,226
United Kingdom
135
51,794
Türkiye
97
50,933
Vietnam
64
40,655
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | GlassFish | LiteSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.7 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 600 ms | 1000 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
GlassFish to LiteSpeed
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| portalgb.com.br | Oct 2025 |