IBM HTTP Server vs LiteSpeed
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
IBM HTTP Server · LiteSpeed · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
15
Open Page Rank 8+
2
233
Open Page Rank 7+
7
871
Open Page Rank 6+
13
2,027
Open Page Rank 5+
18
4,745
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
IBM HTTP Server · LiteSpeed · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
122
123,292
United States
192
84,795
Poland
54
75,651
Brazil
78
75,601
Indonesia
68
74,226
United Kingdom
107
51,794
Türkiye
59
50,933
Vietnam
62
40,655
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | IBM HTTP Server | LiteSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.7 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 1000 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.