IBM HTTP Server vs LiteSpeed
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
IBM HTTP Server · LiteSpeed · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
16
Open Page Rank 8+
2
238
Open Page Rank 7+
7
892
Open Page Rank 6+
13
2,084
Open Page Rank 5+
18
4,867
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
IBM HTTP Server · LiteSpeed · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
131
142,798
United States
211
96,715
Indonesia
83
90,611
Poland
59
83,488
Brazil
84
81,829
United Kingdom
129
60,596
Türkiye
62
60,567
Vietnam
62
49,050
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | IBM HTTP Server | LiteSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.8 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 1000 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.