IBM HTTP Server vs LiteSpeed
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
IBM HTTP Server · LiteSpeed · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
16
Open Page Rank 8+
2
229
Open Page Rank 7+
7
854
Open Page Rank 6+
13
1,989
Open Page Rank 5+
18
4,646
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
IBM HTTP Server · LiteSpeed · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
120
108,379
United States
193
81,175
Poland
49
72,768
Indonesia
68
71,564
Brazil
74
68,054
United Kingdom
112
50,531
Türkiye
53
49,519
Vietnam
53
39,882
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | IBM HTTP Server | LiteSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.6 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 1000 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.