InstantCMS vs Tilda
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
InstantCMS · Tilda · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
2
Open Page Rank 8+
2
46
Open Page Rank 7+
4
165
Open Page Rank 6+
4
324
Open Page Rank 5+
7
543
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
InstantCMS · Tilda · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Russia
264
61,388
Belarus
47
6,195
Kazakhstan
38
5,858
Ukraine
34
5,241
Germany
27
3,896
United States
14
3,023
Netherlands
15
2,841
Uzbekistan
15
2,351
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | InstantCMS | Tilda |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.5 s | 2.2 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 600 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.