InstantCMS vs Tilda
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
InstantCMS · Tilda · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
3
Open Page Rank 8+
2
45
Open Page Rank 7+
4
164
Open Page Rank 6+
4
321
Open Page Rank 5+
7
527
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
InstantCMS · Tilda · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Russia
259
61,927
Belarus
46
6,157
Kazakhstan
39
5,955
Ukraine
35
5,133
Germany
24
3,400
United States
14
2,764
Netherlands
17
2,641
Uzbekistan
14
2,297
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | InstantCMS | Tilda |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.5 s | 2.2 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 600 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.