jQuery Migrate vs TurfJS
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
jQuery Migrate · TurfJS · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
135
7
Open Page Rank 8+
2,856
45
Open Page Rank 7+
14,491
105
Open Page Rank 6+
32,660
160
Open Page Rank 5+
66,346
208
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
jQuery Migrate · TurfJS · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
988,550
1,642
Germany
361,975
316
India
354,719
269
Japan
329,383
168
France
322,388
351
Italy
315,256
235
United Kingdom
313,223
322
Brazil
282,509
270
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | jQuery Migrate | TurfJS |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 2.7 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0.05 |
| TTFB | 1100 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
jQuery Migrate to TurfJS
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| inikosku.com | Oct 2025 |
| couchtuner.one | Oct 2025 |
| gisdoc.com | Sep 2025 |
| restar.by | Jul 2025 |