KineticJS vs Three.js
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
KineticJS · Three.js · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
3
49
Open Page Rank 8+
28
402
Open Page Rank 7+
66
1,117
Open Page Rank 6+
99
1,863
Open Page Rank 5+
144
2,890
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
KineticJS · Three.js · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
675
14,651
India
586
12,049
Germany
503
7,569
Philippines
143
7,023
United Kingdom
332
6,357
France
398
5,842
Japan
184
6,009
Brazil
269
5,679
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | KineticJS | Three.js |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.9 s | 2.5 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
KineticJS to Three.js
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| subharti.org | Jun 2026 |