KineticJS vs Three.js
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
KineticJS · Three.js · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
2
48
Open Page Rank 8+
26
399
Open Page Rank 7+
63
1,113
Open Page Rank 6+
94
1,854
Open Page Rank 5+
140
2,881
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
KineticJS · Three.js · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
674
15,152
India
588
12,368
Germany
503
7,574
United Kingdom
330
6,545
Philippines
140
6,604
France
420
6,090
Japan
181
6,014
Italy
334
5,764
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | KineticJS | Three.js |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.9 s | 2.4 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
KineticJS to Three.js
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| subharti.org | Jun 2026 |