Litespeed Cache vs RackCache
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Litespeed Cache · RackCache · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Litespeed Cache · RackCache · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Litespeed Cache | RackCache |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 2 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Litespeed Cache to RackCache
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| albacorp.net | Dec 2025 |
RackCache to Litespeed Cache
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| easyfitness-syke.de | Mar 2026 |
| easyfitness-achim.de | Feb 2026 |
| easyfitness-oberneuland.de | Feb 2026 |
| conversio.id | Jul 2025 |