Litespeed Cache vs WPCacheOn
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Litespeed Cache · WPCacheOn · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
10
0
Open Page Rank 8+
149
0
Open Page Rank 7+
666
0
Open Page Rank 6+
1,713
0
Open Page Rank 5+
4,012
0
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Litespeed Cache · WPCacheOn · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
102,927
1
United States
91,228
0
Brazil
74,152
0
Indonesia
52,215
0
United Kingdom
46,128
0
Türkiye
36,175
2
Spain
31,809
0
Poland
29,801
0
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Litespeed Cache | WPCacheOn |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 3.9 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 112 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 1650 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.