Litespeed Cache vs WPCacheOn
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Litespeed Cache · WPCacheOn · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
11
0
Open Page Rank 8+
156
0
Open Page Rank 7+
680
0
Open Page Rank 6+
1,728
0
Open Page Rank 5+
4,011
0
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Litespeed Cache · WPCacheOn · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
89,144
0
United States
79,835
0
Brazil
65,918
1
Indonesia
40,852
0
United Kingdom
40,159
0
Spain
29,935
0
Türkiye
29,918
1
Poland
26,626
0
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Litespeed Cache | WPCacheOn |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 5.9 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1100 ms | 1800 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.