LiteSpeed vs thttpd
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
LiteSpeed · thttpd · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
16
0
Open Page Rank 8+
238
0
Open Page Rank 7+
892
1
Open Page Rank 6+
2,084
2
Open Page Rank 5+
4,867
3
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
LiteSpeed · thttpd · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
142,798
3
United States
96,715
10
Indonesia
90,611
2
Poland
83,488
1
Brazil
81,829
4
United Kingdom
60,596
4
Türkiye
60,567
1
Vietnam
49,050
1
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | LiteSpeed | thttpd |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 1.5 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 37 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 550 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.