LiteSpeed vs thttpd
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
LiteSpeed · thttpd · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
15
0
Open Page Rank 8+
233
0
Open Page Rank 7+
871
1
Open Page Rank 6+
2,027
2
Open Page Rank 5+
4,745
2
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
LiteSpeed · thttpd · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
123,292
3
United States
84,795
7
Poland
75,651
2
Brazil
75,601
5
Indonesia
74,226
1
United Kingdom
51,794
3
Türkiye
50,933
1
Vietnam
40,655
1
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | LiteSpeed | thttpd |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 1.7 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 62 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.