LiteSpeed vs thttpd
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
LiteSpeed · thttpd · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
18
0
Open Page Rank 8+
238
0
Open Page Rank 7+
864
0
Open Page Rank 6+
1,984
1
Open Page Rank 5+
4,601
1
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
LiteSpeed · thttpd · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
108,379
3
United States
81,175
8
Poland
72,768
2
Indonesia
71,564
3
Brazil
68,054
3
United Kingdom
50,531
4
Türkiye
49,519
2
Vietnam
39,882
1
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | LiteSpeed | thttpd |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 1.2 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1000 ms | 500 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.