Material Design Lite vs Tailwind CSS

Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.

177,421
websites
vs
2,377,382
websites

Top sites by authority

Material Design Lite · Tailwind CSS · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers

Open Page Rank 9+ 20 144
Open Page Rank 8+ 270 2,426
Open Page Rank 7+ 786 9,686
Open Page Rank 6+ 1,352 18,516
Open Page Rank 5+ 2,088 31,900

Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.

By country

Material Design Lite · Tailwind CSS · share of sites in each country using one or the other

United States 15,300 220,170
India 6,577 138,926
Brazil 4,919 120,568
United Kingdom 6,046 90,607
Germany 5,629 89,244
France 4,963 75,646
Canada 4,458 66,637
Indonesia 2,993 64,082

Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.

Real user performance

Metric Material Design Lite Tailwind CSS
LCP 2.1 s 2.1 s
INP 75 ms 100 ms
CLS 0 0
TTFB 1000 ms 700 ms

Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.

Sites that switched

Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.

All Material Design Lite sites · All Tailwind CSS sites

Look up any website for free

No paywall, no lead-gen, no account. Paste a domain and see what powers it.

No account neededHistory since 2018