Moat vs Site Kit
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Moat · Site Kit · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
36
Open Page Rank 8+
0
649
Open Page Rank 7+
0
2,698
Open Page Rank 6+
0
5,893
Open Page Rank 5+
0
12,351
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Moat · Site Kit · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
5,772
215,676
India
2,972
110,602
Japan
1,446
82,773
Brazil
2,284
80,295
France
2,396
74,632
United Kingdom
2,935
72,179
Spain
2,134
67,753
Italy
2,154
63,679
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Moat | Site Kit |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.9 s | 2.4 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 1300 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Moat to Site Kit
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| embajada-guineaecuatorial.com.ve | Feb 2026 |
| arthurspizza.com.au | Sep 2025 |