Network for Good vs Qgiv
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Network for Good · Qgiv · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
3
2
Open Page Rank 8+
13
12
Open Page Rank 7+
45
46
Open Page Rank 6+
69
85
Open Page Rank 5+
112
170
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Network for Good · Qgiv · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
2,132
2,961
India
121
146
Canada
103
138
United Kingdom
87
98
Philippines
67
56
Mexico
58
64
Indonesia
62
54
Australia
56
60
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Network for Good | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.7 s | 1.7 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Network for Good to Qgiv
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| cac-swfl.org | Jul 2026 |
| bacoa.org | Apr 2026 |
| peakradar.com | Nov 2025 |
| rankinfoundation.org | Oct 2025 |
Qgiv to Network for Good
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| serveshelby.com | Jan 2026 |