OneSignal vs PushEngage
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
OneSignal · PushEngage · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
11
2
Open Page Rank 8+
167
6
Open Page Rank 7+
706
17
Open Page Rank 6+
1,392
31
Open Page Rank 5+
2,349
53
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
OneSignal · PushEngage · share of sites in each country using one or the other
India
12,179
196
United States
10,769
243
Brazil
8,551
85
Germany
6,588
129
United Kingdom
6,487
157
France
5,745
118
Spain
5,712
115
Italy
5,589
116
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | OneSignal | PushEngage |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.5 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 125 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1100 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
OneSignal to PushEngage
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| mundoincrivelbr.com.br | Oct 2026 |