Plasmic vs WordPress Block Editor
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Plasmic · WordPress Block Editor · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
57
Open Page Rank 8+
1
1,117
Open Page Rank 7+
3
4,139
Open Page Rank 6+
8
8,189
Open Page Rank 5+
13
15,359
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Plasmic · WordPress Block Editor · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
71
148,638
Japan
14
85,006
India
38
70,372
Germany
21
60,181
United Kingdom
33
52,969
France
18
51,370
Spain
47
42,570
Italy
15
42,277
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Plasmic | WordPress Block Editor |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 2 s |
| INP | 112 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 850 ms | 1100 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.