Plasmic vs WordPress Block Editor
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Plasmic · WordPress Block Editor · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
59
Open Page Rank 8+
0
1,132
Open Page Rank 7+
2
4,265
Open Page Rank 6+
7
8,420
Open Page Rank 5+
11
15,726
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Plasmic · WordPress Block Editor · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
82
171,482
Japan
16
97,233
India
34
81,964
Germany
23
68,421
France
21
61,663
United Kingdom
35
61,013
Italy
19
46,900
Spain
21
46,877
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Plasmic | WordPress Block Editor |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 2 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 600 ms | 1100 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.