Plasmic vs WordPress Block Editor
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Plasmic · WordPress Block Editor · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
60
Open Page Rank 8+
1
1,129
Open Page Rank 7+
3
4,191
Open Page Rank 6+
8
8,308
Open Page Rank 5+
13
15,552
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Plasmic · WordPress Block Editor · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
70
151,348
Japan
12
85,837
India
40
71,384
Germany
20
61,162
United Kingdom
32
53,075
France
20
51,017
Italy
16
40,146
Spain
39
39,836
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Plasmic | WordPress Block Editor |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.1 s | 2 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 1100 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.