Plasmic vs WordPress Site Editor
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Plasmic · WordPress Site Editor · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
40
Open Page Rank 8+
1
435
Open Page Rank 7+
3
1,143
Open Page Rank 6+
8
1,885
Open Page Rank 5+
13
2,929
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Plasmic · WordPress Site Editor · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
71
20,735
India
38
8,606
Germany
21
8,286
France
18
7,603
United Kingdom
33
7,487
Brazil
21
5,698
Italy
15
5,391
Spain
47
5,123
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Plasmic | WordPress Site Editor |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 1.8 s |
| INP | 112 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 850 ms | 1000 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.