POWR vs Wheelio
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
POWR · Wheelio · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
8
0
Open Page Rank 8+
46
0
Open Page Rank 7+
115
0
Open Page Rank 6+
195
0
Open Page Rank 5+
299
0
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
POWR · Wheelio · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
12,259
23,083
United Kingdom
2,923
11,460
India
2,270
11,663
Germany
1,704
11,531
Canada
3,184
9,329
France
1,509
9,256
Brazil
774
9,835
Spain
1,164
8,959
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | POWR | Wheelio |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.5 s | 1.8 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 800 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Wheelio to POWR
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| kellotarvike.fi | Jan 2026 |