POWR vs Wheelio
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
POWR · Wheelio · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
8
0
Open Page Rank 8+
50
0
Open Page Rank 7+
130
0
Open Page Rank 6+
219
0
Open Page Rank 5+
340
0
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
POWR · Wheelio · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
14,435
26,877
United Kingdom
3,466
13,137
India
2,664
13,540
Germany
1,979
13,797
Canada
3,775
10,894
France
1,827
11,216
Brazil
888
11,100
Spain
1,302
10,175
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | POWR | Wheelio |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.5 s | 1.9 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 800 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Wheelio to POWR
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| kellotarvike.fi | Jan 2026 |