Qgiv vs RaiseDonors
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Qgiv · RaiseDonors · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
3
0
Open Page Rank 8+
13
0
Open Page Rank 7+
46
2
Open Page Rank 6+
83
4
Open Page Rank 5+
177
8
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Qgiv · RaiseDonors · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
2,961
70
India
146
18
Canada
138
19
United Kingdom
98
16
Mexico
64
8
Australia
60
10
Philippines
56
12
Indonesia
54
7
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Qgiv | RaiseDonors |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.7 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 1000 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
RaiseDonors to Qgiv
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| erieartsandculture.org | Apr 2026 |