Rickshaw vs Three.js
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Rickshaw · Three.js · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
45
Open Page Rank 8+
4
403
Open Page Rank 7+
8
1,136
Open Page Rank 6+
16
1,901
Open Page Rank 5+
23
2,906
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Rickshaw · Three.js · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
85
15,668
India
90
12,588
Germany
51
8,278
United Kingdom
66
7,106
Japan
46
6,694
France
59
6,615
Philippines
36
6,395
Italy
57
6,184
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Rickshaw | Three.js |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2 s | 2.5 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 900 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Rickshaw to Three.js
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| unimed.ac.id | Apr 2026 |