Ruby Receptionists vs Slider Revolution
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Ruby Receptionists · Slider Revolution · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
0
26
Open Page Rank 8+
0
391
Open Page Rank 7+
0
1,338
Open Page Rank 6+
0
2,629
Open Page Rank 5+
0
4,932
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Ruby Receptionists · Slider Revolution · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
185
95,006
Italy
3
56,969
India
8
50,416
Spain
2
44,248
Germany
2
39,238
France
2
32,189
Brazil
3
31,226
United Kingdom
4
30,145
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Ruby Receptionists | Slider Revolution |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.2 s | 2.5 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 1100 ms | 1300 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.