Softr vs WordPress Site Editor
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Softr · WordPress Site Editor · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
1
40
Open Page Rank 8+
2
435
Open Page Rank 7+
7
1,143
Open Page Rank 6+
12
1,885
Open Page Rank 5+
29
2,929
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Softr · WordPress Site Editor · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
323
20,735
India
131
8,606
Germany
91
8,286
France
165
7,603
United Kingdom
129
7,487
Brazil
64
5,698
Italy
52
5,391
Spain
76
5,123
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Softr | WordPress Site Editor |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.5 s | 1.8 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0.05 | 0 |
| TTFB | 800 ms | 1000 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.