Sortable vs Twitter Ads
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Sortable · Twitter Ads · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
1
104
Open Page Rank 8+
1
1,656
Open Page Rank 7+
12
5,949
Open Page Rank 6+
22
10,559
Open Page Rank 5+
37
17,009
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Sortable · Twitter Ads · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Japan
49
81,700
United States
194
69,437
India
68
33,719
United Kingdom
126
32,274
Canada
127
26,144
France
70
20,992
Spain
61
20,740
Indonesia
42
19,597
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Sortable | Twitter Ads |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.3 s | 1.8 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.