Sortable vs Twitter Ads
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Sortable · Twitter Ads · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
1
100
Open Page Rank 8+
1
1,622
Open Page Rank 7+
11
5,814
Open Page Rank 6+
20
10,220
Open Page Rank 5+
35
16,382
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Sortable · Twitter Ads · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Japan
41
80,085
United States
192
69,081
India
62
33,070
United Kingdom
115
32,682
Canada
113
26,321
Spain
53
21,889
France
61
21,110
Indonesia
46
19,306
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Sortable | Twitter Ads |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.4 s | 1.8 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 75 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Sep 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.