Three.js vs Visx
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Three.js · Visx · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
45
3
Open Page Rank 8+
403
8
Open Page Rank 7+
1,136
14
Open Page Rank 6+
1,901
18
Open Page Rank 5+
2,906
23
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Three.js · Visx · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
15,668
84
India
12,588
60
Germany
8,278
38
United Kingdom
7,106
43
Japan
6,694
34
France
6,615
37
Philippines
6,395
28
Italy
6,184
31
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Three.js | Visx |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
| INP | 75 ms | 100 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 900 ms | 600 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Three.js to Visx
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| portals.fi | Aug 2025 |