Tilda vs Woltlab Community Framework
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Tilda · Woltlab Community Framework · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
2
1
Open Page Rank 8+
47
2
Open Page Rank 7+
168
15
Open Page Rank 6+
331
29
Open Page Rank 5+
559
44
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Tilda · Woltlab Community Framework · share of sites in each country using one or the other
Russia
69,408
40
Belarus
7,238
16
Kazakhstan
7,015
14
Germany
5,150
1,318
Ukraine
6,416
40
United States
4,354
140
Netherlands
3,273
103
Uzbekistan
2,931
14
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Tilda | Woltlab Community Framework |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 2.3 s | 0.9 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 700 ms | 300 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Jun 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.