ActBlue vs Qgiv
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
ActBlue · Qgiv · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
5
2
Open Page Rank 8+
12
10
Open Page Rank 7+
39
40
Open Page Rank 6+
68
77
Open Page Rank 5+
116
161
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
ActBlue · Qgiv · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
2,056
2,809
Canada
88
126
India
70
123
United Kingdom
66
93
Indonesia
69
46
Mexico
42
55
Australia
40
56
Philippines
37
52
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | ActBlue | Qgiv |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.4 s | 1.7 s |
| INP | 50 ms | 50 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 700 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Qgiv to ActBlue
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| tuesdayforumcharlotte.org | Jan 2026 |