Attentive vs Movable Ink
Head-to-head usage across the sites we track.
Top sites by authority
Attentive · Movable Ink · how many of each technology's sites sit in the web's highest authority tiers
Open Page Rank 9+
4
3
Open Page Rank 8+
39
34
Open Page Rank 7+
200
111
Open Page Rank 6+
444
167
Open Page Rank 5+
902
233
Open Page Rank scores 0 to 10 from the open web link graph; 9+ covers only a few hundred domains worldwide.
By country
Attentive · Movable Ink · share of sites in each country using one or the other
United States
7,507
948
Canada
3,912
592
United Kingdom
3,151
549
India
3,038
529
Australia
2,248
405
Mexico
1,757
407
Germany
1,694
415
France
1,599
388
Audience countries from the Chrome UX Report, top markets of either technology.
Real user performance
| Metric | Attentive | Movable Ink |
|---|---|---|
| LCP | 1.7 s | 2.1 s |
| INP | 100 ms | 125 ms |
| CLS | 0 | 0 |
| TTFB | 500 ms | 800 ms |
Median site's p75 values from the Chrome UX Report, Aug 2026. Lower is better; green meets Google's "good" threshold. This describes the sites that use each technology, not the technology's own overhead.
Sites that switched
Domains that dropped one technology and adopted the other within about a year, data nobody else gives away free.
Attentive to Movable Ink
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| vitalchoice.com | Feb 2026 |
| wolfermans.com | Oct 2025 |
Movable Ink to Attentive
| Domain | When |
|---|---|
| claires.com | May 2026 |
| vitalchoice.com | Feb 2026 |
| wolfermans.com | Oct 2025 |